{"id":2097,"date":"2010-05-07T00:30:11","date_gmt":"2010-05-07T07:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/disruptionblog.com\/?p=2097"},"modified":"2010-05-07T00:30:11","modified_gmt":"2010-05-07T07:30:11","slug":"have-you-noticed-slight-changes-in-google-here-is-your-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/2010\/05\/07\/have-you-noticed-slight-changes-in-google-here-is-your-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"Have you noticed slight changes in Google ? Here is your guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>OOoooh Google has a new interface. And of course, it introduces some slight changes in the way you use tools in Google. Here is a good article summarizing the changes and wrapping up the modifications in the tools, as well as some useful advices \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>Search is power.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Source : <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/meet-the-new-google-41286\">http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/meet-the-new-google-41286<\/a><\/p>\n<div>\n<blockquote><p>After months of testing, Google is <a href=\"http:\/\/googleblog.blogspot.com\/2010\/05\/spring-metamorphosis-googles-new-look.html\">releasing<\/a> a new look-and-feel for its search results today, a three column design  that provides a permanent menu of search options and tools to help  searchers  refine their queries. Google also gains a freshly-updated  logo along the way.<\/p>\n<p>The new user interface \u2014 UI for the tech crowd \u2014 places search  options into a column on the left-hand side of the search  results page.  Search results themselves appear in the middle, in a wider column. Ads  appear in the right column, though some ads continue to  appear in the  middle column above editorial picks:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"New Google  UI\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/new-google-ui-500x272.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"272\" \/><\/p>\n<p>To me, the new look is colorful yet clean and not distracting. It  should make it easier for searchers to drill-down further into their  queries. Having personally tested it in the past, when I\u2019ve been  included in Google\u2019s trial tests like <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/yes-more-seeing-new-google-36964\">many  others picked randomly<\/a>, I\u2019m glad to see it finally go mainstream.  It rolls out today worldwide in 26 languages. Google tells me that by  the end of the day, everyone should see the new look.<\/p>\n<p>Many of the options in the new left-hand search options column aren\u2019t  new. Google made many of these features available <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/live-blogging-google-searchology-19032\">a  year ago<\/a> and then <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-adds-visited-pages-past-hour-fewer-shopping-sites-filtering-27019\">expanded<\/a> them last October (see <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/up-close-with-google-search-options-26985\">Up    Close With Google Search Options<\/a>). However, in order to find the  options, you had to \u201copen up\u201d the search options column that by default  was left off. Today\u2019s change opens up the column permanently, which  should cause many more people to make use of these.<\/p>\n<p>The move to a permanently three-column design sees Google following  in the footsteps of Ask.com, which pioneered the look back in 2007. Bing  and Yahoo followed the three pane trend in 2009, and now it has  effectively been given the stamp of approval by search giant Google  itself.<\/p>\n<p>Below, a closer look at the new design and options, followed by some  history and background. <strong> Search Options Column<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The new search options column (or left panel, as Google calls it  internally) is devoted to ways for people to refine their searches:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Search Options  Column\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/search-options-column.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"153\" height=\"541\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Within the column are three sections, which I\u2019ll cover in turn.<\/p>\n<p>The top portion lists \u201ccontent types,\u201d that is, the types of content  that a search can be narrowed to. For example, in the search below for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=tidal+waves\">tidal waves<\/a>, you  can see that the results contain things like web pages, images and video  matches, all blended together in the same column as part of Google\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-universal-search-2008-edition-13256\">Universal  Search<\/a> system:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Tidal Waves\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/tidal-waves-500x611.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"611\" \/><\/p>\n<p>That the default \u201cEverything\u201d search \u2014 where Google is mixing  together everything it believes is relevant to your query, regardless of  the exact content. <strong> Filtering By Content Type<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What if you\u2019d like only images of tidal waves? That\u2019s where the  colorful content type choices come in. Select \u201cImages\u201d and that content  type gets highlighted in blue, to indicate that the results to the right  have now been filtered to show only image matches (along with, oddly,  two ads from Google rivals Yahoo and Ask both hoping to catch some  Google searchers):<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Tidal Wave  Images\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/tidal_wave_images-500x395.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"395\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Similarly, select the Videos option, and now only matching videos are  shown:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Tidal Wave  Videos\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/tidal_wave_videos-500x359.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"359\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Exactly which content type options appear depend on the actual query.  Google says it automatically tries to highlight the most relevant  filtering that people may want, based on the content that it finds for a  search.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the tidal wave search above features options to narrow  by Images and Videos. But a search for iPhone provides provides  different narrowing options:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"iPhone Search  Results\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/iphone-500x205.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"205\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Now the choices are to narrow by Shopping, News and Blog content. The  assumption is that people searching for iPhone information may be most  interested in these categories of results, while those searching for  tidal waves may be more interested in images or videos. As before,  selecting one of these other options narrows to the particular content  type, such as how choosing News brings back only news content about the  iPhone:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"iPhone News  Results\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/iphone_news-500x406.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"406\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Not happy with the content choices that Google features by default?  That\u2019s where the \u201cMore\u201d option at the end of the list comes in. Select  that, and you can see all available options:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"More Content  Types Button\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/more_button.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"239\" height=\"299\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sources Of Content<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Where\u2019s all this content coming from? Google has many specialty  search engines that it taps into. Below are the ones that the new menu  gives access to:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Blogs: <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/blogsearch.google.com\/\">Google Blogs<\/a>, blog and RSS\/feed  content from across the web. See our\u00a0<a title=\"View all posts filed  under Google: Blog Search\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/library\/google\/google-blog-search\">Google:  Blog  Search<\/a> category for more background.<\/p>\n<div>\n<p><strong>Books:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/\">Google  Books<\/a>, book results from Google\u2019s library scanning project and books  contributed by authors and publishers. See our\u00a0<a title=\"View all posts  filed under Google: Book Search\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/library\/google\/google-book-search\">Google:  Book  Search<\/a> category for more.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Images:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/images.google.com\/\">Google  Images<\/a>, matching images from around the web. See our\u00a0<a title=\"View  all posts filed under Google: Images\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/library\/google\/google-images\">Google:  Images<\/a> category for more.<\/p>\n<p><strong>News:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/news.google.com\/\">Google News<\/a>,  news and blog content from across the web. See our\u00a0<a title=\"View all  posts filed under Google: News\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/library\/google\/google-news\">Google:  News<\/a> category for more.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Maps:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/\">Google Maps<\/a>,  maps and local listings from across the web and third-party sources.  See our <a title=\"View all posts filed under Google: Maps &amp; Local\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/library\/google\/google-maps-local\">Google:  Maps  &amp; Local<\/a> category for more.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Shopping:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/products\">Google  Product Search<\/a>, product and shopping listings from across the web.  See our <a title=\"View all posts filed under Google: Product Search\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/library\/google\/google-product-search\">Google:   Product Search<\/a> category for more.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Videos:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/video.google.com\/\">Google  Video<\/a>, video from across the web \u2014 including Google-owned YouTube  but not limited to that. See our <a title=\"View all posts filed under  Google: YouTube &amp; Video\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/library\/google\/google-youtube-video\">Google:   YouTube &amp; Video<\/a> category for more.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Updates:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-launches-real-time-search-31355\">Google  Real Time Search<\/a>, which shows the latest information found by  Google from sources such as news, blogs and especially social sharing  sites such as Twitter, Facebook and MySpace. Unlike the other services  above, Google Real Time Search does not have a standalone site that you  can use. See our <a title=\"View all posts filed under Google: Real Time  Search\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/library\/google\/google-real-time-search\">Google:   Real Time Search<\/a> category for more information.<\/div>\n<div>Missing from the list is an option to narrow results to Reviews,  something Google had <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/up-close-with-google-search-options-26985\">previously  tested<\/a> but which didn\u2019t appear to make the final cut.By the way, Google does have more specialty or \u201cvertical\u201d search  engines than the ones listed in the new content types area, including:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/codesearch\">Code Search<\/a><\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/dirhp\"> Directory<\/a><\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"http:\/\/finance.google.com\/finance\"> Finance<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/groups.google.com\/\">Groups<\/a><\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/patents\"> Patent Search<\/a><\/li>\n<li> <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/\"> Scholar<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Why don\u2019t these show up as content types? This is because Google only  shows content types for the search engines it automatically checks for  any query.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, do a search, and Google\u2019s Universal Search system  automatically checks places like Google Images and Google Books for  matches. However, it doesn\u2019t automatically query places like Google  Finance or Google Scholar. So, those don\u2019t appear as narrowing options.<\/p>\n<p>To further confuse matters, Google also has a few specialized search  tools that DO automatically get checked for any query, such as <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-music-search-28697\">Google  Music<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-answers-your-health-questions-with-health-onebox-24675\">Google  Health<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/intl\/en\/help\/features.html\">movie  times and more<\/a>. However, you can\u2019t narrow results to these. These  results only show within special \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/meet-the-google-onebox-plus-box-direct-answers-the-10-pack-26706\">OneBox<\/a>\u201d  units.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Search Tools<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019ve made it through digesting the new content types in the  search options column, there\u2019s more fun in store midway down, in the  search tools section. This allows you to narrow results within a content  type by time or by other relevant filters.<\/p>\n<p>As with content types, what appears by default will depend on the  type of query issued. For example, for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&amp;q=volcanic+ash\">volcanic  ash<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Volcanic Ash\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/ash_options.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"285\" height=\"394\" \/><\/p>\n<p>\u201cLatest\u201d is shown as a time filtering option, which makes sense given  that many people may seek the latest results on this breaking news  topic.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, consider these filtering choices for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&amp;q=ipad\">iPad<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"iPad Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/ipad_options.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"279\" height=\"436\" \/><\/p>\n<p>\u201cLatest\u201d returns as a time filter, along with \u201cPast 3 Days.\u201d But more  interesting are the \u201cFewer shopping sites\u201d and \u201cMore shopping sites\u201d  options. Again, these make sense. For this query, Google can safely  assume many people might be interested in shopping info about the iPad.  However, a good chunk of people might also want more informational pages  about the iPad \u2014 hence a handy ability to \u201cdeshoppify\u201d the results.<\/p>\n<p>As with content types, if you\u2019re not happy with the default search  tools picks that Google makes, you can use the \u201cMore search tools\u201d  option to see a full range. Here\u2019s what you get doing that from an  \u201cEverything\u201d search:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Search Tools\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/search_tools.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"287\" height=\"425\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Time Filtering<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The first set of tools involve filtering by time \u2014 narrowing to  \u201cLatest\u201d results, past 24 hours, past week, month, year or even a custom  date range, complete with pop-up calendar picker:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Custom Time\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/custom_range-500x266.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"266\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Occasionally, I\u2019ve also seen other options appear, such as \u201cPast 2  months\u201d or \u201cPast 3 days,\u201d as noted above.<\/p>\n<p>While time filtering sounds great, my experience over the years has  been that search engines, including Google, often get the dates wrong on  pages for a variety of reasons. For a deeper drill-down on these  issues, see these past articles:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/up-close-with-google-search-options-26985\">Up   Close With Google Search Options<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/squeezing-the-search-loaf-finding-search-engine-freshness-crawl-dates-10619\">Finding    Search Engine Freshness &amp; Crawl Dates<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you select a date option, by default results will be sorted by  relevance within that date period. For instance:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Past 24  Hours\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/past_24-500x394.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"394\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Above, I did a search for the word <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&amp;tbo=1&amp;prmdo=1&amp;tbs=qdr:d&amp;q=the&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=\">the<\/a>,  narrowed to the past 24 hours. I like this search because it points out  one issue with date filtering. Notice the White House home page is  third on the list, with a time of 11 hours ago. That\u2019s not the time the  page was first authored \u2014 the White House has been online much longer  than that! It might be the time when Google last noticed a change was  made to the page. It could also simply be the last time Google visited  the page. Such are the issues when filtering by date.<\/p>\n<p>Mainly, however, notice that the pages are not listed in  chronological order. Some \u201cfresher\u201d pages appear below older ones.  That\u2019s because the default sort is by relevancy. However, select the  \u201cSorted by date\u201d option, and this changes: <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Sorted By Date\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/sorted_by_date-500x389.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"389\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Nearby Filtering <\/strong> Another option is the ability to filter results to those near your  location \u2014 at least the location Google assumes you\u2019re at, which it  determines by the internet address (IP address) reported by your  internet service provider, company, school or organization.<\/p>\n<p>Nearby filtering sounds great. For example, a seach for topics such  as bicycle rentals or zoos or moving companies when toggled to \u201cnearby\u201d  should bring back results relevant to your particular location.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, I didn\u2019t find using the option made much difference,  much as was the case when we first reported on it being offered in  Feburary (see <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-adds-local-search-to-options-panel-36966\">Google   Adds \u201cNearby\u201d Local Search To Options Panel<\/a>). In part, I suspect  this is because Google already does localizing of results by default,  through its <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-now-personalizes-everyones-search-results-31195\">personalized  results<\/a>. For instance, since Google already knows I\u2019m in San  Francisco (at the time I wrote this), many of my results I tested  already had San Francisco-related material ranking highly. In effect, I  was already being shown \u201cnearby\u201d results even without clicking on that.<\/p>\n<p>The nearby options are shown below. When selected, you can further  refine \u201cnearby\u201d to mean at your city, region or state level \u2014 as well as  entering a custom location, if Google\u2019s not detecting your area  correctly:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Set Location\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/location.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"137\" height=\"182\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>View Options<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Further down, there are three alternative \u201cviews\u201d you can apply to  your results other than the default \u201cstandard\u201d view:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"View Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/views.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"135\" height=\"90\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Related Searches puts a list of queries related to your original  search at the top of the search results:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Related  Searches\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/related_searches.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"448\" height=\"311\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Timeline tries to build a timeline of interesting facts related to  your query, by exacting information about the subject that\u2019s associated  with particular dates on web pages. You get a chart and facts listed in  chronological order:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Timeline  View\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/timeline-500x322.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"322\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Wonder Wheel is a visual refinement tool, which allows you click your  way through related topics as they eminate out like spokes on a wheel.  Each click to a new topic causes the results shown alongside the current  \u201cwheel\u201d to change:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Wonder Wheel\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/gizmodo_wheel-500x287.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"287\" \/><\/p>\n<p>See also <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-wonder-wheel-17093\">The  Google  Wonder Wheel &amp; Other Search Refinement Features Get Live Test<\/a> for more about using the tool.<\/p>\n<p><strong>More Filtering Options<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>After the view options are additional ways to filter your results,  some of which really belong either as additional view options or content  type options, in my opinion, as I\u2019ve <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/up-close-with-google-search-options-26985\">written  before<\/a>. The options:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Filtering  Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/filtering_options.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"142\" height=\"126\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Sites With Images gives you what\u2019s promised \u2014 web sites that also  have images. Since most web sites have images, it\u2019s hard to imagine this  being that useful. But if you really want to read something and want  pictures to go with it, maybe it\u2019s worth a try. Here\u2019s an example of  what you get:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Sites With  Images\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/sites_with_images-500x377.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"377\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Fewer Shopping Sites \/ More Shopping Sites feels a lot like the  Nearby option \u2014 it makes slight changes to the results that can be hard  to notice. The main thing is that if you don\u2019t like getting a Google  Shopping one box unit like this in your results:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Now You See  Shopping Results\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/shopping-500x395.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"395\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Then using the Fewer option makes it disappear: <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Now You Don't!\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/less_shopping-500x376.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"376\" \/> Using the More Shopping option also makes it appear. But if you\u2019re  really after shopping results, it makes more sense to use the Shopping  content type option.<\/p>\n<p>Page Previews will insert little thumbnail images of pages listed in  the results: <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Page Previews\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/previews-499x329.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"499\" height=\"329\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Translated Search is kind of neat. It shows results that are not in  your native language (as detected by your browser) and translates them  into your language.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Translated  Search\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/translated-500x544.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"544\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Something Different<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Finally, the last portion of the search options column is called  \u201cSomething Different.\u201d It\u2019s meant to suggest other queries that are  related to your original one. For example, for Steve Jobs, people like  Bill Gates or Michael Dell are suggested:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Something  Different\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/steve_different.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"352\" height=\"546\" \/><\/p>\n<p>For a generic term like salads, you get items like pizza or salad bar  suggested:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Salads Are  Different\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/salads.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"273\" height=\"448\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Somewhat related to this is a new feature that <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-shows-related-results-at-bottom-of-results-pages-similar-to-40731\">came  out last week<\/a>, \u201cPages Similar To\u201d \u2014 not to mention a long-standing  feature, \u201cSearches related to.\u201d Both are shown below, in how they appear  at the bottom of the search results for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=best+buy\">best buy<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Pages\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/pages-500x206.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"206\" \/><\/p>\n<p>You can see how Google suggest related pages \u2014 which really are  related companies like CircuitCity or Walmart. That can be handy for  searchers, though it probably drives some brand holders crazy that  Google\u2019s recommended their competition (similar to how it <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-recommends-the-competition-on-your-place-page-35316\">does  this<\/a> on Places pages in Google Maps). Below this come suggested  searches.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bottom Redesign<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As long as we\u2019re at the bottom of the search results, it\u2019s also worth  noting they\u2019ve gotten a facelift as part of the new look and have been  cleaned up. The old: <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Old Bottom\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/bottom_old-500x158.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"158\" \/><\/p>\n<p>and the new:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"New Bottom\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/bottom_new-500x156.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"156\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Specific Search Tools For Specific Content Types<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When I covered search tools above, I looked at what appeared in  response to an \u201cEverything\u201d search. However, when you drill into  particular areas, the Search Tools may change \u2014 sometimes dramatically  so.<\/p>\n<p>For example, in a search for iPhone narrowed to Images, you get new  options designed to let you narrow by size, type (face, photo, clip art,  line drawing) or by color:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Image Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/image_options.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"157\" height=\"646\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Narrowing to video brings up video-related options such as length of  clip, time it was published, video quality, use of closed captioning and  source of clip:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Video Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/video_options.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"157\" height=\"679\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Filtering to books allows options to find books that are \u201cfull view\u201d  (you can read them in their entirety), to filter to magazines, to see  results in a grid display and even filtering time \u2026. by century!<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Book Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/books.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"161\" height=\"473\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Selecting discussion allows for special filtering such as discussions  on forums versus Q&amp;A sites as well as \u201cshort\u201d versus \u201cmedium\u201d and  \u201clong\u201d discussions:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Discussion  Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/discussions.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"159\" height=\"518\" \/><\/p>\n<p>For blogs, there are short time options, such as 10 minutes or the  past hour:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Blog Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/blog_options.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"161\" height=\"363\" \/><\/p>\n<p>For news, there are options to see \u201call news\u201d versus news images or  news from blogs:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"News Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/news_options.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"257\" height=\"485\" \/><\/p>\n<p>If I click to filter to news content from blogs, I also get  specialized time filtering options, such as over the past hour or for  particular years, 2007, 2008 and so on:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"News Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/news_options_001.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"217\" height=\"508\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Also notice how the colorful content type bars have suddenly  disappeared. That second drill-down kicked me over into Google News  itself, rather than the main Google.com site \u2014 and the new UI didn\u2019t  carry through there.<\/p>\n<p>Things like that also happen if you use either the Shopping or Maps  areas. Drilling into these bring up specific options but not keeping the  look-and-feel of the new left column. Shopping looks like this:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Shopping  Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/shopping_options.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"187\" height=\"608\" \/><\/p>\n<p>You can see that once you go into Shopping, all the other content  type choices disappear. You can\u2019t \u201ctab\u201d back to them.<\/p>\n<p>The same is true for Maps. In addition, three column design goes  away, falling back to two columns \u2014 one on the left for listings and  textual infomation, while the right column is for the map itself:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Map Options\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/maps.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"488\" height=\"725\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Google\u2019s aware of the issues with Shopping and Maps.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re just not there yet, but they\u2019re coming soon,\u201d said\u00a0Johanna  Wright,  director of product management at Google.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A New Logo<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In other changes, Google\u2019s logo has had a facelift. Gone are the  heavy drop shadows. The colors are said to be \u201cpunched up,\u201d and did you  know the Google L was a bit crooked? It\u2019s had a nose job now. The old  and new:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Logos\" src=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/figz\/wp-content\/seloads\/2010\/05\/old_new_logo.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"289\" height=\"217\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Also gone is the trademark notation, TM. Google said it didn\u2019t show  well on smaller sizes of its logo and that it was determined to be no  longer necessary to show.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Playing Copycat?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Back in June 2007, Ask.com made a splash with its new three column  look called <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/ask-relaunches-now-ask-3d-11379\">\u201cAsk  3D.\u201d<\/a> The left column was used to present search refinement options,  similar to how Google is showing them generally now. The middle column  had results. Unlike Google, the third column didn\u2019t have ads but rather  was used for vertical search results.<\/p>\n<p>Two years later, in June 2009, Microsoft <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/meet-bing-microsofts-new-search-engine-20093\">relaunched  its search engine as Bing<\/a>. It also used a three column design, with  the left column for search refinement options.<\/p>\n<p>Then in August 2009, <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/yahoos-new-search-clothes-but-will-it-help-probably-not-24369\">Yahoo  did the same<\/a>, a three column design, with left column used for  refinement (see )<\/p>\n<p>Now Google has made the jump, raising the inevitable question \u2014 isn\u2019t  it just copying the others?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have been working on a left-hand nav since 2006 and in mocks far  before that,\u201d Wright said.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, left-hand navigation was spotted in the wild back in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seologs.com\/?p=124\">December 2005<\/a>, though it was  very rudimentary. And arguably, Google had a solid three column look  when the search option column was unveiled as a user choice last year,  just before the Bing launch.<\/p>\n<p>I doubt that will prevent Bing from poking fun that Google\u2019s just  copying them \u2014 much less people from Ask back who were there back when  Ask 3D launched under then CEO Jim Lanzone from feeling like everyone is  copying them. Ironically, Ask <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/askcom-goes-back-to-1996-with-new-release-14951\"> dropped<\/a> the three column look about a year later after a management  change.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Why Now?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Fun about who is playing copycat aside, why has it taken so long to  finally get a three column design, a format that Google\u2019s vice   president of search product and user experience Marissa  Mayer described  last November as a \u201cuniversal truth,\u201d to finally become a permanent  addition to Google? (See <a href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/google-streamlines-search-options-30143\">Google     Tackles Its \u201cUI Jazz\u201d Problem, Tests Streamlining Search Options     Feature<\/a> for her comments and some of the design philosophy behind  today\u2019s changes)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe real issue for us has really been when our technology  would be  powerful enough and relevant enough that it [search options] deserves to  be on the results  pages,\u201d Wright said.<\/p>\n<p>For related news, see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techmeme.com\/100505\/p23#a100505p23\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techmeme.com\/100505\/p30#a100505p30\">here<\/a> on  Techmeme.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s a key issue. Google doesn\u2019t want to have the same options  showing up all the time, regardless of what someone searches on. It aims  to have only the most relevant options appear, so they stand out and  are useful.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ll see how well Google hits that goal. Some options offered don\u2019t  always seem useful; some don\u2019t perform as dramatically as I might have  expected, with very limited testing that I\u2019ve done so far. But often  they do work very well, and I\u2019m certainly glad to have them within handy  reach, rather than having to search, then push a button to get access  to them.<\/p>\n<p>And do people really use them?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAbsolutely. We don\u2019t want to give out any numbers here, but we\u2019re   definitely seeing more usage of the tools and the properties,\u201d Wright  said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OOoooh Google has a new interface. And of course, it introduces some slight changes in the way you use tools in Google. Here is a good article summarizing the changes and wrapping up the modifications in the tools, as well as some useful advices \ud83d\ude42 Search is power.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3443,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2097","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-seo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2097","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2097"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2097\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2097"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2097"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kerolic.net\/c\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}